[R-G] Canada: Losing Water Through NAFTA
mstainsby at resist.ca
Mon Sep 24 13:46:34 MDT 2007
Canada: Losing Water Through NAFTA
by Stephen Leahy
Global Research, September 23, 2007
Inter Press Service
Email this article to a friend
Print this article
Under the North American Free Trade Agreement, Canada lost control over
its energy resources. Now, with “NAFTA-plus”, it could also lose control
over its freshwater resources, say experts.
Canada’s water is on the trade negotiating table despite widespread
public opposition and assurances by Canadian political leaders, said
Adèle Hurley, director of the University of Toronto’s Programme on Water
Issues at the Munk Centre for International Studies.
A new report released Sep. 11 by the programme reveals that water
transfers from Canada to the United States are emerging as an issue
under the auspices of the Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP). The
SPP — sometimes called “NAFTA-plus” — is a forum set up in 2005 in
Cancún, by the three partners, Canada, United States and Mexico.
Economic integration as envisioned by the powerful but little-known SPP
is slowly changing the lives of Canadians, says Andrew Nikiforuk, author
of the report “On the Table: Water Energy and North American Integration”.
The SPP is comprised of business leaders and government officials who
work behind the scenes and are already responsible for changes to border
security, easing of pesticide rules, harmonisation of pipeline
regulations and plans to prepare for a potential avian flu outbreak,
“The SPP is run by corporate leaders; governments are irrelevant,” said
Ralph Pentland, a water expert and acting chairman of the Canadian Water
Pentland envisions a future where, in response to ongoing drought
problems in the United States, the SPP will make arrangements to dole
out millions of dollars of public funds for private companies to build
pipelines to transfer water from Canada.
“The SPP is like putting the monkeys in charge of the peanuts,” he told
Massive water diversions from Canada do not make economic or
environmental sense, according to water experts. Far better and cheaper
is to improve water efficiency and eliminate waste. The United States
and Canada lead the world in water consumption and are extraordinarily
wasteful, Pentland says.
Moreover, most of Canada’s water is in the far north, not near its
border with the United States. And even the transboundary Great Lakes
are at their lowest levels in 100 years due to climate change, notes
William Nitze, prominent member of the SPP and chairman of GridPoint
Inc., a company that makes energy management systems, is not in favor of
bulk water exports.
“Water management has been poor in all three countries,” Nitze said.
Canada, for example, favors guidelines over mandatory rules for keeping
pollutants out of water. And Mexico needs to double its investment in
its water infrastructure, he noted.
Nikiforuk agrees that Canada has mismanaged its water resources. He
points out that Canada already ships enormous volumes of water to the
United States, in the form its main exports: grain, cattle, hogs,
aluminum, automobiles and oil. Each of these requires many tons of water
to produce, but the latter is perhaps the most controversial.
Most of Canada’s oil comes from the tar sands, a 125-billion-dollar
capital project in the boreal forest of northern Alberta province. One
million barrels of oil flow south each day to the U.S. making Canada its
However, it takes three barrels of freshwater to produce one barrel of
oil from the tar sands, says Nikiforuk.
The project already consumes 359 million cubic metres of water, enough
for a city of two million people in Canada. Ninety percent of the water
becomes contaminated and has to be stored in vast tailings impoundments.
More than 10 of these exist, covering an area of 50 square km.
Members of the SPP North American Energy Working Group met in Houston,
in the southern U.S. state of Texas, in 2006, where they talked about
the “pipeline challenge”, a proposed a five-fold increase in production
at the tar sands, said Nikiforuk.
“No mention was made of water at the meeting, but there isn’t nearly
enough water in the region for this kind of expansion,” he said.
Under NAFTA rules, Canada cannot reduce its energy exports to the United
States, according to Gordon Laxer, director of the Parkland Institute, a
research network at the University of Alberta. “The U.S. is the most
energy wasteful nation on Earth. And Canada is sacrificing its
environment to feed America’s addiction to oil,” Laxer said in an interview.
“Respected energy analyst Matthew Simmons told me Canada should stop
furthering the U.S. addiction to liquid fuels and make it illegal to use
fresh water in tar sands,” said Nikiforuk.
There is ample evidence that environmental standards and stewardship in
Canada and Mexico have plummeted since NAFTA went into effect in 1994,
and “accelerated trade under the SPP means accelerated environmental
abuse,” he said.
*Originally published by Latin American newspapers that are part of the
Tierramérica network. Tierramérica is a specialised news service
produced by IPS with the backing of the United Nations Development
Programme and the United Nations Environment Programme.)
Global Research Articles by Stephen Leahy
moderated radical news & discussion list:
In the contradiction lies the hope.
More information about the Rad-Green