[Marxism] Developments in the world economy and the concept of foreign ownership
ok.president+marxmail at gmail.com
Mon May 28 11:41:17 MDT 2007
On 5/27/07, Marvin Gandall <marvgandall at videotron.ca> wrote:
> I tend to think this accelerating interpenetration of global capital in
> world economy is no more reversible than was the consolidation of local
> regional markets into national ones. If that's the case, it challenges
> classical nationalist and Marxist concepts about foreign ownership and the
> inevitability of inter-imperialist war based on the competing interests of
> national bourgeoisies. But I'd be interested to know what others think, or
> if they can direct me to material which contradicts the above.
Your argument here seems somewhat similar to the views of Michael Hardt and
Antonio Negri (the increasing irrelevance of "nation-states" as distributed
networks of capital emerge to replace localised poles) that they develop in
their book "Empire".
For a critique (explicit or implicit) of this line of thinking, you could
look at the essay by John Bellamy Foster called "Imperialism or 'Empire'"
published in the Monthly Review a few years ago. David Harvey's 2003 book
"The New Imperialism" is also interesting (see especially the chapter called
"Capital Bondage" in that book), in this regard.
More information about the Marxism