[Marxism] Cyber One Korea
Yoshie Furuhashi
furuhashi.1 at osu.edu
Mon Jul 26 15:29:50 MDT 2004
>I am rather astonished that Yoshie is "encouraged" by the large
>number of S Koreans wanting to communicate with their countrymen
>and women of the north, apparently the real reason for the
>popularity of the gambling site. I have been under the impression
>for years that unification is the deepest desire of the Korean
>people, North and South. In fact, I have been led to believe that
>that desire and the desire to rid the peninsula as a whole of
>American troops has been the mainstay of N Korean diplomacy and the
>chief goals of the regime, as well as many, many in S Korea;
>further, that this two-fold emphasis is what has held the feet of
>the S Korean regime to the fire with respect to maintaining and
>expanding the Sunshine Policy (for eventual reunification of the
>country). It is the slow turning of these worms that is helping to
>convert the 30,000 US troops in S Korea into 30,000 hostages because
>it is evident that the S Korean people will not tolerate their use
>as a military force against their compatriots in the North, making
>the troops useless as an offensive threat but nevertheless
>un-withdrawable by the US for broader geopolitical reasons (at least
>for now).
>
>David McDonald
Several qualifications:
1. Opinion polls show a clear generational divide in South Korea,
South Koreans younger than 50 expressing more positive opinions about
China and North Korea than the United States and those older than 50
expressing the opposite attitudes. See "Changing Korean Perceptions
of the Post-Cold War Era and the U.S.-ROK Alliance," <a
href="http://www.eastwestcenter.org/stored/pdfs/api067.pdf">April
2003</a>.
2. "The Pentagon is moving 3,600 U.S. troops from South Korea to
Iraq this summer, a shift that highlights the stress on the U.S. Army
and promises a significant change in the way the United States helps
defend the Korean peninsula" (Josh White, "U.S. Troops Moving From S.
Korea to Iraq: 3,600 to Leave in Shift of Defense Plan,"
<em>Washington Post</em>, <a
href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A34653-2004May17.html">May
18, 2004</a>, p. A15 ). Moreover, "A U.S. plan to cut the number of
its troops in South Korea by one-third by the end of 2005 will force
the South to shoulder more responsibility for defending itself
against any North Korean military aggression. The U.S. plan calls
for withdrawing 12,500 of the 37,000 U.S. troops stationed in South
Korea, according to a statement released Monday by the U.S. military
in Seoul" (The Associated Press, "U.S. Plans to Reduce Troops in S.
Korea: Washington Seeks to Withdraw 12,500 Troops by End of 2005," <a
href="http://msnbc.msn.com/id/5155285/">June 8, 2004</a>). The
change is dictated more by Washington's need for more US troops to
continue its occupation of Iraq than by the strength of South Korean
sentiments against US bases and troops in South Korea. At the same
time, Seoul is stepping up its participation in the occupation of
Iraq:
<http://montages.blogspot.com/2004/07/philippines-and-south-korea_14.html>.
3. Unification of the Korean peninsula is proceeding on South Korean
terms, mainly taking the form of more South Korean investment into
North Korea.
Yoshie
More information about the Marxism
mailing list