Patents in market socialism
jschwart at freenet.columbus.oh.us
Mon Feb 5 13:45:00 MST 1996
I asked Dave Schweickart about this. He said he'd be inclined to treat
patents as commodities rather than assets, i.e., to vest their ownership
with the patent holders, for a limited time of course. He says he's not
doctrinal about this and would support whatever rule would create
incentives for innovation without compromising social ownership of assets.
On Thu, 1 Feb 1996, Justin Schwartz wrote:
> I still haven't thought this through. But if there are patents in MS, why
> is that a problem? Note by the way that a parent in the S-model will
> probably assign income and use rights to the inventor, but not absolute
> ownership. If we are talking about a productive asset, it will belong to
> the state and the patent user will have tp pay an assets tax on its value.
> And will be responsible for maintaining its value, too!
> On Sun, 28 Jan 1996 HANLY at brandonu.ca wrote:
> > One key incentive to encourage innovation under capitalism is extensive
> > patent protection. If entrepreneurs either as individual corporations or
> > worker owned industries are to be encouraged to invest large sums in
> > new products the argument is that they need protection from competition
> > from those wh can snatch the info without the costs. THence patents are
> > granted and this creates
> > dynamic efficiency if I remember the catechism correctly- as contrasted
> > with static efficiency. Defenders of market socialism claim that the market as
> > contrasted with command, planned, systems encourages entrepreneurs and thus new
> > ideas and products. So are we to have patents in the brave new market socialist
> > world? After all, it is patents that protect the entrepreneur.
> > Cheers, Ken Hanly
> > --- from list marxism at lists.village.virginia.edu ---
> --- from list marxism at lists.village.virginia.edu ---
--- from list marxism at lists.village.virginia.edu ---
More information about the Marxism