[CrashList] CrashL: Jela-For Whom the Bell Tolls. EU one Nation?

John Clancy jclancy at smartchat.net.au
Mon Nov 27 17:33:25 MST 2000

from: jclancy at smartchat.net.au
subject: CrashL: Jela -For whom the Bell tolls. EU one Nation?
Delivered-To: jclancy at smartchat.net.au
From: "Mrs. Jela Jovanovic" <nerajov at EUnet.yu>
To: "crashlist at lists" <crashlist at lists.wwpublish.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2000 Subject: [CrashList] For Whom the Bell Tolls
Sender: crashlist-admin at lists.wwpublish.com
X-BeenThere: crashlist at lists.wwpublish.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: crashlist at lists.wwpublish.com
List-Id: CrashList <crashlist.lists.wwpublish.com>

    The URL for this article is

[Emperor's Clothes]

For  Whom the Bell Tolls
by Jared Israel (11-21-2000)

"No man is an Iland,  intire of itselfe; every man is a peece of the
 Continent, a part of the  maine; if a Cloud be washed away by the
Sea, Europe  is the lesse, as well as if a Promontorie were, as well
as if a Manor of thy  friends or of thine owne were; any man's death
diminishes me, because I am  involved in Mankinde; And  therefore
never send to know for whom the bell  tolls; It tolls for thee."
(MEDITATION XVII., Devotions upon Emergent Occasions by John Donne)

A  country's foreign policy has some consistency, and for good
reason; it is   the best planned expression of the political and
economic goals of that   country's Establishment. Why should it be a
surprise, then, that the U.S. government, which created the monstrous
assault on justice called the International Criminal Tribunal for the
Former Yugoslavia, has done the same thing in Rwanda? (1)

We just published a critique called 'One-Sided  Justice At The Rwanda
 Tribunal'. (2) We at Emperor's Clothes have benefited  >from
conversations with  and written reports by several experts on the
Rwandan situation including  members of the superb team of Canadian
lawyers  who have defended Hutu leaders  accused of war crimes. We
must make this  information available to our  readers. It shows that
the Rwandan War Crimes  Tribunal is every bit as much  an assault on
Justice as the better-known War  Crimes Tribunal for Yugoslavia,  at
the Hague.

Rwanda and Yugoslavia  may seem far away but Western citizens will
ignore  these Tribunals at their  peril. Why? Because they are
controlled by the West  and represent a  sea-change in Western legal

Not that Western legal institutions  do not routinely violate the
principles  of legal fairness, sometimes called  'natural justice'.
But the Yugoslav and  Rwandan Tribunals take these  violations of
principle (such as the  independence of judges from  prosecutors, the
guarantee of trial by a jury of  one's peers, habeas corpus,  and the
right of defense councils to  cross-examine witnesses) and enshrine
them as Legal Theory.

In some ways the Rwandan Tribunal is even worse  than the Yugoslav
Tribunal  because the Rwandan Tribunal operates on Rwandan  soil and
helps consolidate  the power of the pro-US Tutsi regime over the
militarily defeated Hutus.

Mr. Svilanovich has a Game Plan

It is  revealing that Goran Svilanovich, the newly installed Foreign
Minister  of  Yugoslavia, refers to the Rwandan Tribunal when he
describes his plans for   Yugoslavia:

"But like Kostunica, Mr. Svilanovic would favor 'truth  commissions'
of  experts here 'to examine and collect evidence of war crimes  by
those  allegedly defending the Serbian nation but also those who
committed  crimes  against Serbs, to present the facts to the people
here, to raise  awareness.'  Some of that evidence might come from
The Hague tribunal, he  said.

"Only then would he favor a trial. On the precedent of Rwanda, he
said: ''We  can find a way to do it here, on Yugoslav territory, with
the  participation  of The Hague tribunal.''' (our emphasis, 'NY
Times',  11-20-2000)

Foreign Minister Svilanovich is a pupil of US foreign policy
operatives like  Madeline Albright and Robert Gelbard. (3) His
comments on  the Rwandan  Tribunal reveal the thinking of his
Masters. First the U.S.  leaders foment  civil conflict. Then they
use phony War Crimes Tribunals to  crush those who  resist colonial

Thus the purpose of the War  Crimes Tribunal on Yugoslavia is not to
attack  all Serbian leaders. Rather,  it is to crush those leaders
who resist. Little  quislings like Mr.  Svilanovich are safe from
harm as long as they behave, and  serve their  Masters.

The Exquisite Difficulty of Serving

But this may be  easier said than done. The goals of U.S. and German
Imperial  Beings are  defined not by principle but by position: they
want the greatest  possible  control of the Balkans, Africa,
everything. Give them an arm, they  will  demand your leg. Their
watchword is: MORE.

If the Tribunal does succeed  in setting up shop in Belgrade, that
is, if  Yugoslav (and worldwide!)  popular hatred for the Tribunal
does not succeed in  stopping it, NATO will  attempt, with the help
of their Belgrade quislings, to  hunt down those who  have resisted
and/or who currently resist NATO rule. The  Tribunal may  initially
avoid the big names (Miloshevich, Mladich, Karajich)  in order to
prevent a confrontation with the Yugoslav army, most of whose
 officers and  soldiers are patriots who loathe NATO. They may
instead nibble  away at the  small fry of resistance, the unsung
heroes, thus attempting to  establish the  Tribunal's de facto
legitimacy and demoralize its opponents.  The Tribunal  may use the
infinitely flexible 'secret list' of war crimes  suspects as a
herding tool, like an electric cattle prod. For example, people  in
the very  large Serbian Socialist Party who speak out against
President  Koshtunitsa  may find themselves on the Tribunal's 'secret
list' whereas  others, who hold  their tongue, may, temporarily, not.
The key word here is  'temporarily', for  if the NATO Tribunal
succeeds in eliminating the first  rank of patriots,  they will go
for level two, level two being comprised of  those who wavered
between kneeling and fighting back. And so on.

And on.

You see,  there is no end to this. No degree of compliance, no
service  rendered, no  betrayal of principle or of friends or of
family will  permanently suffice.  As the U.S. and Germany
consolidate their control of a  territory, their  demands increase by
due proportion: yesterday's compliance  does not satisfy  today.
Eventually, even a Koshtunitsa, perhaps even a  Svilanovich may find
himself in a jail cell, asking, "Why? Was it something I  said?" And
the  Guard will say: "Shut up, scum."

This scenario, of course, leaves out  half the game. The people of
Yugoslavia  are the other player. They have  learned a lot about the
U.S. and Germany over  the past ten years. Vast  numbers are now
getting an education in what it  means to have a government  led by
Mr. Koshtunitsa, are learning that Voyislav  Koshtunitsa is the
nationalist coating required to swallow the bitter pill of  betrayal,
called  Zoran Jinjich (Djindjic).

So we are talking about one possible future,  about what NATO wants,
about  what the picture would look like were the NATO  Tribunal to

No place to hide

It would be an ugly  picture, right? Good thing it's all taking place
in far  off Yugoslavia (and  Rwanda). Right?

Alas, this is a small world, my friends; abuse of power  cannot long
afflict  the black skin of the Hutu or the white skin of the Serb
before it also  attacks my precious Brooklyn, N.Y. skin, or even your
skin,  dear reader. Even  your skin is not safe from harm. Before too
long the legal  theories embodied  in the Yugoslav and Rwandan
Tribunals will be advocated,  as matters of  principle, in the
highest courts in the US, Canada and Western  Europe. As  matters of

Does that sound preposterous? Well,  chew on this: Louise Arbour,
enthusiastic  advocate of the worst illegalities  at the Yugoslav
Tribunal, has been  appointed to the Canadian Supreme Court.  God
help Canada. (4)

The article which we just published on Rwanda,  called 'One-Sided
Justice At  The Rwanda Tribunal,' provides factual  information and
sharp analysis, yet I  think it has a flawed solution. It  calls for
giving the Rwandan Tribunal the

"open mandate of the  International Criminal Tribunal for the former
 Yugoslavia (ICTFY) which  covers all war crimes committed in the
Balkans since  1991."

The hope  is expressed that in this way the Rwandan Tribunal may
prosecute war   criminals on all sides.

I fear the author underestimates the depth  of the corruption he

The Yugoslav tribunal does not prosecute  war criminals on all sides.
It has  refused to indict the leading war  criminals, the US and West
European leaders  who bombed Yugoslavia and  fomented the breakup of
Yugoslavia. (5) It works in  partnership with  fascistic regimes, for
instance, the Islamist government of  Eliya  Izetbegovich, to hunt
down and violently abuse Pro-Yugoslav Serbian  leaders.  (6)

The Yugoslav Tribunal victimizes those who tried and continue to try
to hold  Yugoslavia together. The victims are falsely accused of war
crimes,  then  hunted down using the most horrifying methods. Why?
Because the U.S.  and  Germany have worked for ten years to destroy
Yugoslavia and to this end  they  want to eliminate those who oppose
their policy.

Evidence  suggests that the U.S. Establishment was behind the Rwandan
violence  as  well. (We will publish some such evidence in coming
weeks) The author of  the  excellent 'One-Sided Justice At The Rwanda
Tribunal' wants the United   Nations Security Council to correct what
he views as flaws in the Rwandan   Tribunal. But the United Nations
Security Council has become a rubber stamp   for U.S. foreign policy.
So here is the 64 dollar question: how can War   Criminals correct
injustices in the courts they have created?

The  Yugoslav and Rwandan Tribunals must be abolished.

- Jared  Israel


Further reading

1) On the illegitimacy of the  Yugoslav War Crimes Tribunal, see
'Unjust from  the Start, Part III: The  Illegal Basis of the War
Crimes Tribunal' by Dr.  Kosta Cavoski which can be  read at

2) On the Rwanda Tribunal, see 'One-Sided Justice At The Rwanda
Tribunal'  which can be read at http://emperors-

3) Concerning Goran Svilanovich, who has recently acquired the post
of   Yugoslav Foreign Minister, see 'Facts on the Man Who Invited The
Hague   Tribunal to Belgrade' which can be read at  http://emperors-

4)  On Louise Arbour see 'Louise Arbour- Unindicted War Criminal' by
 Christopher  Black and Edward S. Herman which can be read at

5)  A debate on the origins and nature of the Yugoslav wars of
secession  called  "A Not-So-Nonviolent Debate on the Nonviolence
'Board'" can be read at  http://emperors-

(6) Concerning the Hague Tribunal's cozy relationship with fascist
'Bosniak'  authorities, see 'Unjust from the Start: The War Crimes
Tribunal  vs. Gen.  Djordje Djukic' at http://emperors-

We may be free but we ain't cheap...

Emperor's Clothes is free,  meaning we don't charge a subscription
fee. But of  course nothing is really  free.

We rely mainly on volunteer labor. Nevertheless there are plenty of
bills so  we also rely on our readers for contributions. Small
contributions  help. Big  contributions help even more.

If you like keeping us  around, please make a donation.

You can mail a check to Emperor's  Clothes, P.O. Box 610-321, Newton,
MA  02461-0321. (USA) Or if you have  access to a computer, please go
to our  secure server at http://emperors-

Or call 617 916-1705 between 9:30 AM and 5:30 PM, Eastern Time (USA)
and  Bob  will take your credit card information over the phone.

Thanks for  reading Emperor's Clothes.

www.tenc.net     [Emperor's  Clothes]  " JC 


X-From_: mart at sgci.com  Sat Nov 25 12:40:54 2000
Delivered-To: jclancy at smartchat.net.au
From: "mart" <mart at sgci.com>
To: "Mrs. Jela Jovanovic, Secretary General" <nerajov at EUnet.yu>,
	"Michel Collon" <michel.collon at skynet.be>,
	"People Voice" <pvoice at telus.net>, <bojanp at home.com>,
	<iacenter at iacenter.org>, "John Clancy"
<jclancy at smartchat.net.au>,
	"Granma" <icap at ceniai.inf.cu>,
	"Ivan Stoiljkovic" <narodnifront at yahoo.com>,
	"doslos" <doslos at sprint.ca>
Subject: Fw: [pttp] Arm of the single state. & No profit, no do.
Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2000

Forward from mart.
Please distribute widely.
-----Original Message-----
From: New Worker Online <ncp at geocities.com>
To: Recipient list suppressed <Recipient list suppressed>
Date: November 24, 2000 8:17 AM
Subject: [pttp] Arm of the single state. & No profit, no do.

Editorial - 24/11/2000.
      Arm of the single state

THE government can deny it as much as it likes, but the setting up of
a European military force is yet another step towards the creation of
a single European state. The move is a clear declaration of intent to
press ahead with the agenda for political union.

The Tories have condemned the new force and expressed fears that the
move will undermine Europe s commitment to Nato -- especially since
the forces to be committed to the Euro-force are the same ones
already committed to Nato.

We too condemn this move, but for very different reasons to those of
the Tory party. We are opposed to Nato and the Euro-force because
outfits like these are nothing but the war machines of the
imperialist world -- which we pay for to the tune of billions of
pounds every year.

They exist to enforce the will of the world's leading
transnational companies, big banks, major oil companies, financiers,
industrialists and other sharks whenever these exploiters feel their
interests are threatened. The oppressed, the poor and those striving
for social progress and socialism are the likely targets.

This reality is sanitized by the politicians and media prostitutes
who tell the people that their "bombmg missions" are "humanitarian"
and that their armed invasions are "peacekeeping" exercises. The new
Euro-force has been introduced as having a "peacekeeping" role.

Certainly the creation of the European military force is to some
degree a grand political statement -- a psychological move in pushing
the EU together. But it will also have a real military role both in
policing Europe and in sustaining the occupation of parts of

Perhaps its first "mission" should be to speed up the work of
clearing Yugoslav territory of the large numbers of unexploded
cluster bombs which Nato dropped on its last "humanitarian" visit!

                               ******************** No profit, no do.

LAST week' s climate change summit in The Hague failed to move the
United States more than an inch or two along the road to reducing
carbon emissions into the atmosphere -- a contributory factor in
global warming.

Just as it did at the Kyoto summit, the US wants to simply pay for
extra tree planting schemes to absorb some of the carbons rather than
effectively cut its huge levels of carbon emissions.

This is not surprising. The capitalist world, and especially its
most powerful member, is driven by a system that holds profits to be
everything. Things that cannot be given a price tag and which cannot
make someone a profit simply don't count.

This means that environmental protesters and concerned citizens
around the world are well outgunned by the powerful oil and car
manufacturing lobbies.

The Summit should have been much more successful. After all it was
not raising far-fetched demands -- the cranky views of those who
dream of returning to some pre-industrial golden age of hand looms an
cottage gardens. It was simply calling for increased efforts to make
industry, transport and energy production less polluting and less
dependent on carbon producing fuels and to reduce wastefulness.

Even these aims are not being attained. The answer is not to simply
go for a greener world but to turn it red -- capitalism can't deliver
-- socialism, because it values people rather than profits, can bring
the changes we all need. 

New Communist Party of Britain Homepage

A news service for the Working Class!
     Workers of all countries Unite!
Knowledge is Power! Elimination of the exploitation of man by man
POWER TO THE PEOPLE!    Subscribe: pttp-subscribe at egroups.com " JC

More information about the A-List mailing list